The Newest Rant: Interview Time: Christopher Priest

Readers may recall I had the pleasure of meeting the talented comic creator Christopher Priest at GalaxyCon. Following that, we kept in touch, and he agreed to do an interview for my blog! I greatly enjoyed speaking with him via email, and I now present the interview...

Can you start by introducing yourself? You have quite an impressive body of work, of course!

When I was 19 years old, Larry Hama told me whatever you're doing when you turn 45, that's what you do. Well, 45 is way in my rearview mirror now, so I suppose I am a comic book writer. I'm not sure it was ever my goal to become a comic book writer. Mom wanted me to be a lawyer. But here I am.

Jim Shooter hired me as an intern when I was 17. I was trained in visual storytelling, editing and writing by Shooter, Stan Lee, Larry, and ultimately Danny O'Neil. Over four decades I’ve had the privilege of working on a wide variety of projects and characters with extremely talented people in an industry I love.

You've written for Marvel, DC, and a number of indie series, taking on established characters. You've created characters on multiple occasions as well, such as how you co-created the beloved Quantum and Woody. How does the process of making a comic differ when you're writing an established hero/villain, etc. as opposed to someone you've been involved in the creation of?

Well, when you're working on your own creation there are no set rules and obviously no continuity issues exist. You're working from a blank screen which is a little terrifying to be honest, and you're trying to find something original to say in a business where virtually everything that could be said has been said.

Now, when you're writing an established character within a shared universe, that's a different sort of challenge because there are all of these flags set out along the way. So it becomes kind of a game of skill to work within the rules without breaking them, and to honor what has come before without ignoring it or, worse, retconning it.

Your run on Deathstroke was superb. I joke with people, I always said I did not like Deathstroke, then when you were writing him I suddenly loved reading about the character...until the series ended and suddenly Deathstroke bored me again! The mix of action and family drama was a hoot in the series, and many of my friends loved the run too. Was there something specific that made you want to write Deathstroke when DC kicked-off the, "Rebirth," era and you did the series?

I think “want” is maybe too strong a word. For a long time before Deathstroke, I wasn't writing anything. I assume we get into that in the next paragraph. So when the opportunity to write Deathstroke presented itself, I gave that a lot of serious thought and asked myself what I always ask myself when I approach the superhero genre: what would this guy be like if he was actually walking around in the world I live in?

I prefer to write realistic, grounded takes on these characters, mostly because I believe that, for the most part, that’s where the audience is. By “grounded” I don’t necessarily mean “dark,” my Deathstroke certainly was not “dark.” But it was fairly realistic. I feel like, the more “real” we make the work and the characters, the more vividly the larger-than-life aspects will “pop.”

In 1970, Denny O’Neil briefly wrote a very grounded Superman, collected in DC Finest: Superman: Kryptonite Nevermore. If you’ve never read that, do yourself a solid and pick it up. It certainly was not “dark,” neither was my Superman: Lost. But, see, I do not believe Superman (or any Kryptonian) can fly faster than the speed of light. It’s absurd to believe that and it kind of insults the intelligence of our audience. Superman is only “super” under this set of very specific conditions, conditions that rapidly shift as he moves through outer space.

So Superman (or Supergirl, with all due respect to the brilliant Tom King) planet-hopping is Silver Age nonsense. Absent a Green Lantern or, say a magical Black Adam to tow him to the next galaxy, it would take years if not centuries for a Kryptonian to make those kinds of journeys. My position puts me at odds with the current vision for Superman, which is most likely why I am not writing him. I just tend believe a more reasonable and rational, science-based Superman would have broader appeal than Silver Age Magic Guy, where the absolute horror of outer space, of a black infinity of cold death, is routinely diminished with a handwave as any number of gaudily-dressed characters effortlessly traverse infinity in a page turn with little or no fear of being lost forever.

With all due respect to very talented people who make way more money than I do, I think the heightened reality within superhero comics that is now coming across as a bit tired and condescending because it’s really not 1966 anymore. The audience has moved on. We are writing for a mainly adult audience which is more sophisticated and who demand more of us. Avengers Endgame is a great example of that, of the audience moving on and becoming more sophisticated than the genre itself. So now something like James Gunn Superman feels indulgently nostalgic and people are celebrating a move away from Zack Snyder, but I think they're celebrating it for the wrong reasons and I think that it was a bit of an overcorrection for the Snyderverse to move into such a heightened reality that not only relies on the audience's suspension of disbelief but asks far too much of it (while making Supes largely a guest star in his own film).

I was Marv Wolfman’s intern when I was a teenager, endlessly copying pages out of Tomb of Dracula. I have an enormous amount of respect but also affection for Marv and for his characters. I wanted to do something that was distinct from his run with Mr. Slade while not violating Marv’s canon. I wanted to take what he did and evolve it a little. And where I landed was Hugh Laurie’s FX show, House MD.

The show fascinated me by presenting this tragically broken individual, a man who loved and wanted to be loved but who was capable of neither. A person who was completely unable to sustain intimate relationships of any kind, even with his best friend. The writing on that show was just so awesome, and I borrowed a lot of those themes for Deathstroke.

Deathstroke has always existed as a book about the world's greatest assassin, which I now find to be rather trite and passe. So, instead, I wrote about the world's worst dad; a guy who loved and wanted to be loved but who was incapable of either. A man who would put a hit out on his own daughter in order to spend time with her “protecting” her from nonexistent assassins, and who would sleep with his son's fiancé to keep him from marrying someone unworthy of him.

This prompted a lot of stress with the then-bosses at DC, a company that wanted to exist within the heightened reality I mentioned earlier. In that environment, there was a gravitational pull to make Deathstroke or, say, Black Adam, an antihero, which is incredibly incorrect.

Deathstroke is a murderer many times over who has corrupted many people, least of all his own son and the presumptively underaged Terra. Black Adam destroyed a neighboring country, murdering perhaps hundreds of thousands. These characters cannot be redeemed. Trying to move them to the center because their name is in the title of the comic book is misguided. The theme of my Black Adam series was, “There Is No Redemption For Black Adam,” something Black Adam himself acknowledged and accepted, so his series became ultimately about legacy, about leaving something better behind because he himself was surely destined for hell.

Speaking of your time on, "Deathstroke," I noticed how you've been making comics for literal decades, but when looking at your oeuvre, there seems to be a good 8-10 years around the earlier 2000s where you did not create much comic-book work. Is there a reason for that you'd be comfortable discussing?

Sure. At some point, I have to presume it was after Black Panther, the industry stopped relating to me as a writer and began relating to me as a “black” writer, a writer with an adjective. People tend to treat such modifiers, “black,” “female,” “gay,” “Your Adjective Here,” as “Less-Than.” I somehow became “Less-Than Writer Christopehr Priest.” Labels are bad, David. Labels categorize individuals, which is why I dislike being referred to as an Adjective Writer. As Less-Than Writer Guy.

During those years I was frequently approached for work, but I was being offered work exclusive to my category, with my pitches for mainstream characters being routinely rejected. So I just did other stuff. I began working in ministry, working with a network of local churches and eventually pastoring two. There is an archive of my online ministry at http://priasnet.org.

There was some mention made recently to my career as a bus driver, which is true, but the chronology was wrong. The bus thing happened way before the 2000’s. I quit comics in 1988 and trained as a bus driver mostly as a lark. As a kid, I’d always wanted to drive busses but Mom was having none of that. The online mentions depicted me as a victim down on his luck post-Panther and post-Milestone, which is not at all true. Union bus drivers make great money, for one thing, and for another, I was still writing comics the entire time. In 1990 I took a big pay CUT to take an editorial job at DC, talked into it by DC’s then Director of Development Mike Gold who promised me the DC gig would pay better than the bus job. It didn’t.

I actually kept the bus job the entire time I was on staff at DC, typically arriving at DC every day wearing my bus driver uniform. I loved driving busses. I was driving busses, frequently wearing my uniform, while Denys Cowan, Dwayne McDuffie and I were developing the Milestone universe.

These years to which you refer, I was not driving. I had moved to Colorado and I could not find a bus company in Colorado who would hire me as a part-timer. I’d begun networking with local ministries and hadn’t the time to work as a full-time driver but really missed driving. I still do.

I found that whole era, those years I was out, to be incredibly unfair to most creators. Publishers tended not to hire writers but to cast them. If the character were a Polynesian lesbian ninja, you had to be a Polynesian lesbian ninja to get that gig. Which is silly. A writer is a writer. The Wire, which featured a riveting and super-accurate depiction of Baltimore street life and was arguably one of the greatest TV shows ever made, was written by two middle-aged white guys.

I found the industry’s behavior particularly annoying in that they spent much of that time period fawning over TV writers who’d wandered over during the guild strikes. The mindset became “TV writers are better than comic book writers,” which is not in any sense true and deeply insulting to craftspeople who have devoted their lives to this art form. TV writers came over, scooped up the prime slots, and were paid two to three times what we were paid. And y’know what? Their stories sucked. And, the moment their TV opportunities opened again, they bailed and went back to Hollywood. It was really insulting.

My being considered an Adjective Writer was particularly insulting to me given that Black Panther was not a book about the black guy. It was a book about the white guy, about Everett K. Ross, the Panther’s U.S. State Department handler. The book was narrated by Ross and was about Ross’ cultural awakening. Before Panther I was a writer-- Green Lantern, Spider-Man, Power Man & Iron Fist, Conan. After? Offered exclusively black characters while being turned down or passed over for other assignments. I was not, ever “blacklisted.” I was not “down on my luck.” I was frequently offered work by both majors and a number of independent publishers. But I was doing other, more important work, and I was displeased by being pigeonholed as Adjective Guy.

Any writer can write any character, a stance I was taking right up until DC offered me Deathstroke, a book that had nothing to do with my ethnicity. Honestly, I could write one heck of a Polynesian Lesbian Ninja Gal (TM).

Mini-series from 1983.

You wrote two different series about characters who often associate with Captain America, with the series made some time apart. Those would be the, "Falcon," mini-series and your, "U.S. Agent," mini-series. Both individuals would have very different interpretations about what it means to be Captain America, and both have, in fact, held the title, as of now. How do you approach characters who often have, "Lived in the shadow," of bigger-name heroes?

I think you have to consider not the shadow but the reflection. For example, in my opinion, Nightwing is an adult survivor of child abuse. I can think of no one less qualified to be a parent than Bruce Wayne, with the possible exception of Slade Wilson. So, what do we do with that?

As I see these characters, Batman is obsessed with vengeance. His first priority is to find the perpetrator and bring them to justice. Nightwing, on the other hand, emphasizes with the victims in a much healthier way. His immediate priority is to see to their needs and their safety. Not to say that Batman doesn't do that, but I believe he does it reluctantly, that he would much rather be chasing the bad guy down the street, but he would not pass up people who are in immediate danger. Jericho, Deathstroke’s son, is the Good Son who is nonetheless stalked by the evil inside him, an evil which can (and did) assert itself if he does not remain vigilant.

So, I ask myself, what are the logical consequences of hanging around this person for any length of time? I was trained by Jim Shooter and I shared a tiny office with Larry Hama for four years. When I left Larry’s office, I had long hair like him, I had his laugh, I had his sense of humor as well as his sense of honor, the Bushido Tradition he embraces. I also had guns in my office, except my guns were fake. Maddie Blaustein and I used to attend editorial meetings with these prop weapons, arriving heavily armed.

For better or worse, I was some parts of Shooter and some parts Hama. That was both good and bad, but the reality of it is this is how you approach characters who grow up with within someone else's shadow. What parts of the main character stick with them?

Also, for what it's worth, I think Sam Wilson as Captain America is an unfortunate choice of fan service and violation of the character. As I see the character, that's not something he would ever embrace or want to do and Steve could never talk him into it. He's just not that guy, not that star spangled idealist. People from Sam’s side of the railroad tracks rarely wrap themselves in flags. Those folks come from a culture of survival, whereas the hopeful patriot middle class tends to come from a culture of investment.

Mini-series from 2020.

Now, I don’t read a lot of comics so maybe someone has written this story, but my version of Sam-as-Cap would be much more subversive. Expecting Sam to function in the role in much the same way as Steve, or to have him perhaps “grow into it,” suggests a kind of cultural assimilation which would require us to erase the ontological Sam Wilson in favor of this silly fan service idea. So, had I written this, it would have been a tale of an epic meltdown, of the government ultimately coming for Sam’s shield, and Sam likely passing it on to Josiah X, which would make a lot more sense and be much more honest to the characters and universe.

Sam is Cap because somebody decided that’s what they wanted to do. It has virtually no logical foundation. Promoting Robin to Batman is fan service. Grayson is a vastly different person than Wayne. If you check out my Captain American and The Falcon series, you’ll see a vastly different Wilson, a guy who would never in a million years take on the Cap role.

You've been writing, "Vampirella," across a number of series for a good bit! She's somewhat of an anti-hero and a horror character at the same time. When writing Vampi, do you enjoy thinking of her more as a superpowered being or fantastical and horrific creature?

Vampirella is a single girl trying to make it on her own in the big city. She just happens to be, y’know, a vampire from outer space. Which means she attracts the attention of all kind of nuts and crazies and demons and her evil twin Draculina and nutty mom Lilith. I tend to think of Vampirella as the best book not enough people are reading because superhero fans are really not going to pick it up and independent comic fans tend to get turned off by the pinup girl covers and assume that the book is vapid and sexist. I hope it is neither.

The artist I'm working with, Ergün Gündüz, is simply amazing. I'm terribly proud of the work that we're doing. The book is funny, poignant, action-packed, complex, filled with vibrant characters and compelling storylines, All of it brought vividly to life by Mr. Gündüz, whose amazing color work and wild imagination amps up my scripts to an incredible degree. I invite everyone to sample it for free here, http://priest.mx/vampi.

Oh, speaking of Vampirella and indie comics, you are also working on, "Sonja: Reborn." This series follows Red Sonja--somewhat—

Hah. Yes, “somewhat.” The series, loosely inspired by Robert E. Howard’s “People of The Dark,” was a hard sell to get approved by Dynamite and, apparently, a harder sell to the Red Sonja faithful. Purists seem to be offended by the premise of a modern woman who finds herself magically transported to Hyboria and awakening to find she is Red Sonja. And, of course, fans who do not read barbarian comics or the Red Sonja character in specific, skipped it, likely because they did not know or understand that premise and assumed it was just another barbarian comic, a genre they weren’t into in the first place.

So this was kind of a suicide mission, an effort to widen the audience for the character by throwing new fans into the briar patch. The new or uninitiated reader would learn about and discover Conan’s world as Maggie(our protagonist) discovers it. That was my theory, anyway.

I imagined the story arc would run twelve issues with a mid-season break after six, but we are apparently (at least as of this interview) not returning after issue #6. Kind of a bummer, the book was a lot of fun.

—as it is someone else who thinks they aren't Red Sonja inhabiting her body in her surreal mystical land. A recent issue did have a cameo from Vampirella. Are there other Dynamite properties you will be working on, and does that Vampi cameo indicate some big crossover could occur between her and Red Sonja at some point as you're writing both series?

No, the Vampirella cameo was just a nod to the Priest Corner of the Dynamite universe, a small pocket of continuity where my specific take on Vampirella resides. The scene was meant to indicate this specific Red Sonja series exists within that pocket, and it was fun. It mirrored the same scene in our recent Vampirella Vol. 7 #1, and has Maggie entering the pawn shop as Vampirella (in her issue #1) exits.

I have at least one unannounced project from Dynamite that I can’t yet talk about, and there’s always new stuff brewing over there.

The run of, "Black Panther," you did is often discussed as being among the best Black Panther comics around. You have a new series set in an alternate future called, "The World to Come," which both stands alone and draws to a degree from your earlier, "Black Panther," work. Former Marvel EIC Joe Quesada is doing the artwork, and it has been a superb read so far. What made you want to revisit the characters and tell a bit of a, "What-if," futuristic story?

Well, I would first describe The World to Come as Joe's book, with me as Garfunkel, the featured guitarist. This was way more Joe's idea than mine. I wanted to do a Black Panther story, something small, that would be in print in time for the first Black Panther movie in 2018. I reached out to editor Wil Moss at Marvel who graciously invited me to participate in that year's Black Panther annual (as well as this year’s 60th anniversary special). And that was it, that was a good deal for me.

I was not aware that Joe was already staging a celebration of the Marvel Knights project. After some discussion, I became part of that effort, collaborating with Joe on the Black Panther leg of it, which eventually became The World to Come.

I took a bit of convincing because I'm pretty sure I jumped the shark with Panther many, many moons ago. The Black Panther belongs to a new generation of creators now and I'm completely fine with that. I would not want to come back to the character unless we found something compelling to say, and Joe actually helped me find that.

My take on Black Panther is an evolution of Fantastic Four #52, wherein the king of this mysterious nation draws the Fantastic Four to his country under false pretenses in order to test himself against them. Which makes Black Panther something less than heroic if you think about it. He's a liar. He is manipulating people, people who approached him in good will. He's also an extremely capable fighter, he is technologically proficient, he's rich, and he is the unquestioned leader of a sovereign nation.

Somewhere along the line, other writers, many of them extremely talented, either didn't read Stan’s story or just became confused. They began confusing Black Panther with Tarzan. Black Panther began behaving a lot like Tarzan, as though he were an uneducated African primitive incapable of holding his own among Marvel's pantheon of heroes, a complete repudiation of Stan and Jack. So initially, in 1998, I was extremely reluctant to handle the character but finally agreed if Joe and Jimmy Palmiottit, who were in charge of Marvel Knights, allowed me creative control to reframe the character back to what Stan and Jack originally imagined, just updated for the 90s.

As I see him, Panther has always been a liar. Has always been misleading, manipulating people who trust him. Panther functions much more like a super villain than a hero, as he achieves not the ultimate good but the ultimate good for Wakanda. He acts out of a narrow self interest. And, while he may or may not be the most technologically brilliant mind in the Marvel Universe, he is easily the most conniving.

Unfortunately, mine seems to be a minority opinion as Panther is rarely written that way. People seem to want to write him as an adventurer, a black super soldier, and want to get inside his head to expound some sense of angst or Peter Parker-esque moral conflict. This is entirely wrong for the character. Not because I said it, but because Stan and Jack wrote it.

Like Sherlock Holmes, Black Panther, by definition, must be smarter than the person writing him. This makes him terribly difficult to write well. If you’ve ever seen Benedict Cumberbatch’s Sherlock, this is what I mean: a guy so smart he’s all but impossible to write. If a reader can get ahead of Panther in any given story, the writer has failed. We should never know what Panther is thinking or what his true goals are. At most, we the reader should be guessing about his motives, and the characters supporting the story should be giving voice to that speculation, while Panther himself remains an unfathomable mystery. Please forgive my arrogance here, but I’m right. Stan and Jack are right.

The World To Come is largely about Panther finally facing the consequences of his choices to distance himself from and frequently deceive people who trust him. The World to Come is about legacy. It is about facing an uncertain future and embracing the reality that, to quote Jean-Luc Picard, that there are fewer days ahead then they are behind. This is a reality for comics creators of my generation. For me and Joe and Jimmy, for John Romita Jr., Mark Waid and many others. In many ways, The World to Come is as much about us as it is about Panther.

I also wanted to challenge myself. My Black Panther relied heavily on a formula where Panther was always at least five steps ahead of his enemies, and his actual motives and means were typically revealed in a third act Scooby-Doo moment where suddenly all of the mouse traps would snap shut and the reader would realize, aha, this was Panther's plan all along.

So, I asked Joe, what if we wrote a story where Panther screws up? And I don't mean he appears to screw up and we reveal later that, aha this was Panther’s plan all along. No, I mean he really screws up. And it not only costs him, but it costs the world?

That would be a unique challenge for me that would make it worth my while to suit up for Panther again, to deconstruct my own formula and challenge myself.

Your discussion of how Black Panther can lie and deceive to help his nation of Wakanda reminded me of something I read/heard once (I don't recall exactly where). Basically, the idea is that Black Panther and Doctor Doom are a lot alike except Black Panther is smarter because he knows to at least pretend to be on the heroes side while pursuing his true interest--the success of his Nation. Doom is too much of a narcissist to pretend he is on the heroes' side in an effort to help Latveria, but Panther is wise and knows if he's on the good side of the heroes he can keep Wakanda safe and trusted. At the end of the day, can any ruler--real or fictional--be more of a hero than a villain in the name of keeping their country prosperous? You seem to be exploring this a good deal in, "The World to Come."

Well, first, I am unsure if Panther cares one way or another about whether he’s on the “good side” of the heroes. I think that’s one of the main points Captain America: Civil War got absolutely right, T’Challa’s lack of deference to American superheroes. T’Challa sees himself not as the representative but as the living embodiment of a nation. He’s not in any way concerned about winning a popularity contest or with public opinion.

I like your contrast between Panther and Doom for Panther 60th anniversary special, I’ve done something similar by teaming Panther with Magneto and contrasting those two.

Generally speaking, I tend to not see political leaders as either good or bad. The United States Founding Fathers were wise enough to craft our governing system to function largely out of self interest, to pit teams of rivals against one another as checks and balances against the tyranny they were rebelling against. The nation is enduring a historically dark period where political calculation is diminishing our collective commitment to that ideal, and craven capitulation has led to a normalizing of incompetence and abhorrent moral failure in leadership.

Were I still writing Black Panther monthly, I imagine T’Challa would be openly disgusted by today’s America. I also imagine I would not be permitted to express that idea because such expression carries definable risks within the dysfunction in which we now find ourselves. That’s how dark America’s skies have become.

Was George Washington a good guy? We would certainly like to think so. Are our current leaders bad guys? I really don’t see it that way. I think our leadership is a reflection of ourselves, cynicism I expressed in my too-brief temporary Justice League run [image above]. It’s easy and, yes, fun to point fingers and yell at each other but, at the end of the day, what is happening in our nation is a reaction to the complexity of fault lines crisscrossing our collective story and our unwillingness to come to terms with who we actually are.

The most fun I’ve had in the past five years or so was working with Phil Noto on Inhumans: Once and Future Kings, which dealt with these kinds of themes. The series dealt with the Inhumans as teenagers on the run and hiding out in New York City at the very birth of the Marvel Universe. I thought, and still think, the Inhumans worked much better as teens, especially in Mr. Noto’s extremely capable hands. Dealing with Black Bolt at the precipice of manhood, the unwelcome weight of leadership poised to be placed on his shoulders, afforded the opportunity to ask these kinds of questions, both of the community of Attilan and our own society.

A lot of the time, when I read your works, I'll notice a nice undercurrent of dark/snarky humor even in serious moments. I enjoy this as a totally stone-faced or utterly silly story can be a bit much, but you always strike a good balance. How do you decide when to work in a bit of a joke/humorous moment when you're plotting a story out?

I think for most comic book writers those moments just present themselves. We either repress that moment for the sake of our narrative, or maybe some of us have either a different sense of humor or lack thereof. Fabian Nicieza and Joe Kelly gave us some of the best of those moments through their work on Deadpool. My work is usually not as over the top as Deadpool, but I think there is an important element to add to any story, including the most deadly serious works. For example, Superman: Lost would be a relentlessly depressing story if I didn't allow those moments their space when they presented themselves. Or, our most recent Vampirella #1, which involved her dealing with postpartum depression, a very dark and serious story, still had a couple of those moments in it because the story really needed them.

But the honest truth is, I'm just a clown. I can't help myself. I can be a mature adult for about 30 minutes, max.

Who is your favorite hero or villain to read about versus to write about?

That's tough because I really can't read comics anymore. Most people who are working professionally have a hard time not reading comics critically and deconstructing the work and examining the creators and their process. I’ll read anything Tom King writes, anything Mark Waid writes. Jason Aaron is brilliant. Brian K. Vaughn’s Paper Girls made me change my whole approach to writing, and Dan Slott’s Spider work was so good it made me want to quit altogether. Slott is brilliant. In a hundred years, I’d never have thought of the stuff this guy comes up with.

Now, if you ask me in a past tense, well that's easy. Denny O'Neil Batman, Elliot S! Maggin and Cary Bates Swanderson Action Comics, virtually anything by Jim Starlin, Mark Waid Flash. Steve Engelhart and Marshal Rogers’ Detective run completely changed how I thought about Batman in specific and comics in general by demonstrating what a grounded, “grown-up” take on the concept could look like. Frank Miller Daredevil changed my life, which is kind of funny because I knew Frank, I knew the guy who wrote it and I was still knocked on my ass.

Is there a dream project/character you have not yet tackled you'd like to do sometime?

Too many to name. In every interview I’ve had in 40 years I’ve given the same answer: Batman, Iron Man. I’ve never been invited.

You made mention of how you're getting older and have been doing comic-books for a long time, outside of the period where you stepped away for a bit. You're a fantastic creator and hopefully don't intend to retire anytime soon, do you?

Not in the near future but, y’know, I’m an old bastard who could keel over at any time. Any interested publishers might want to sign me up sooner than later :-)

Seriously, I love writing (check out my Kindle novels, authored as “James” Priest, at http://christopherpriest.com/amazon, and really love writing comics. I hope to keep doing this until they cart me off to the home!

Thanks again to Christopher Priest for the fantastic interview!

Friday, January 16, 2026

Interview Time: Christopher Priest

No comments:

Post a Comment